Jr. Eguibar et al., SELECTIVE CORTICAL AND SEGMENTAL CONTROL OF PRIMARY AFFERENT DEPOLARIZATION OF SINGLE MUSCLE AFFERENTS IN THE CAT SPINAL-CORD, Experimental Brain Research, 113(3), 1997, pp. 411-430
This study was primarily aimed at investigating the selectivity of the
cortico-spinal actions exerted on the pathways mediating primary affe
rent depolarization (PAD) of muscle spindle and tendon organ afferents
ending within the intermediate nucleus at the L6-L7 segmental level.
To this end we analyzed, in the anesthetized cat, the effects produced
by electrical stimulation of sensory nerves and of the cerebral corte
x on (a) the intraspinal threshold of pairs of single group I afferent
fibers belonging to the same or to different hindlimb muscles and (b)
the intraspinal threshold of two collaterals of the same muscle affer
ent fiber. Afferent fibers were das sified in three categories, accord
ing to the effects produced by stimulation of segmental nerves and of
the cerebral cortex. Twenty-five of 40 fibers (62.5%) were depolarized
by stimulation of group I posterior biceps and semitendinosus (PBSt)
or tibialis (Tib) fibers, but not by stimulation of the cerebral corte
x or of cutaneous and joint nerves, which instead inhibited the PBSt-
or Tib-induced PAD (type A PAD pattern, usually seen in Ia fibers). Th
e remaining 15 fibers (37.5%) were all depolarized by stimulation of t
he PBSt or Tib nerves and the cerebral cortex. Stimulation of cutaneou
s and joint nerves produced PAD in 10 of those 15 fibers (type B PAD p
attern) and inhibited the PBSt- or Tib-induced PAD in the 5 remaining
fibers (type C PAD pattern). Fibers with a type B or C PAD pattern are
likely to be Ib. Not all sites in the cerebral cortex inhibited with
the same effectiveness the segmentally induced PAD of group I fibers w
ith a type A PAD pattern. With the weakest stimulation of the cortical
surface, the most effective sites that inhibited the PAD of individua
l fibers were surrounded by less effective sites, scattered all along
the motor cortex (area 4 gamma and 6) and sensory cortex (areas 3, 2 a
nd 1), far beyond the area of projection of group I fibers from the hi
ndlimb. With higher strengths of cortical stimulation, the magnitude o
f the inhibition was also increased, and previously ineffective or wea
kly effective sites became more effective. Maps obtained when using th
e weakest cortical stimuli have indicated that the most effective regi
ons that produced PAD of group I fibers with a type B or type C PAD pa
ttern were also scattered throughout the sensory-motor cortex, in the
same general area as those that inhibited the PAD of group I afferents
with a type A PAD pattern. In eight fibers with a type A PAD pattern
it was possible to examine the intraspinal threshold of two collateral
s of the same single afferent fiber ending within the intermediate nuc
leus at the L7 segmental level. In six fibers, stimulation of the PBSt
nerve with trains of pulses between 1.5 and 1.86 times threshold (xT)
produced a larger PAD in one collateral than in the other. In seven f
ibers, stimulation of the sensory-motor cortex and of cutaneous nerves
produced a larger inhibition of the PBSt-induced PAD in one collatera
l than in the other. The ratio of the cortically induced inhibition of
the PAD elicited in the two collaterals could be modified by changing
the strength of cortical and of PBSt stimulation. In three fibers it
was possible to inhibit almost completely the background PAD elicited
in one collateral while having little or no effect on the PAD in the o
ther collateral. Changes in the intraspinal threshold of pairs of coll
aterals following electrical stimulation of segmental nerves and of th
e somato-sensory cortex were examined in three fibers with a type B an
d two fibers with a type C PAD pattern. In four fibers the PAD elicite
d by stimulation of cutaneous (4-20xT) and muscle nerves (1.54-3. 7xT)
, or by stimulation of the sensory-motor cortex, was of different magn
itude in the two collaterals. In two experiments it was possible to fi
nd cortical sites in which weak surface stimulation produced PAD in on
e collateral only. The magnitude of the PAD elicited in pairs of colla
terals of group I afferents with a type B or C PAD pattern, or the inh
ibition of the PAD in pairs of collaterals of fibers with a type A PAD
pattern, appeared not to be topographically related to the site of sp
inal projection of the cutaneous and cortico-spinal fibers used for co
nditioning stimulation. The present demonstration of a differential co
ntrol of the PAD exerted on two collaterals of the same afferent fiber
suggests that the profuse intraspinal branching of muscle spindle and
tendon organs is a potentially rich substrate for information transmi
ssion. By means of presynaptic control mechanisms, the terminal arbori
zations of the afferent fibers could function either as a simple unit
or in a fractionated manner, allowing funneling of information to sele
cted groups of central neurons.