STRUCTURAL AND MECHANISTIC BASES FOR THE INDUCTION OF MITOTIC CHROMOSOMAL LOSS AND DUPLICATION (MALSEGREGATION) IN THE YEAST SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE - RELEVANCE TO HUMAN CARCINOGENESIS AND DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
M. Liu et al., STRUCTURAL AND MECHANISTIC BASES FOR THE INDUCTION OF MITOTIC CHROMOSOMAL LOSS AND DUPLICATION (MALSEGREGATION) IN THE YEAST SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE - RELEVANCE TO HUMAN CARCINOGENESIS AND DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY, Mutation research, 374(2), 1997, pp. 209-231
MultiCASE has the ability to automatically determine the structural fe
atures responsible for the biological activity of chemicals. In the pr
esent study, 93 chemicals tested for their ability to induce chromosom
al 'malsegregation' in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae were analyze
d. This 'malsegregation' mimics molecular events that occur during hum
an development and carcinogenesis resulting in an effective loss of on
e chromosome of an autosomal pair and duplication of the homologue. St
ructural features associated with the ability to induce such chromosom
e loss and duplication were identified and compared with those obtaine
d from examination of other toxicological data bases. The most signifi
cant structural similarities were identified between the induction of
chromosomal malsegregation and several toxicological phenomena such as
cellular toxicity, induction of sister chromatid exchanges in vitro a
nd rodent developmental toxicity. Very significant structural similari
ties were also found with systemic toxicity, induction of micronuclei
in vivo and human developmental toxicity. Less significant structural
overlaps were found between yeast malsegregation and rodent carcinogen
icity, DNA reactivity and mutagenicity, and the induction of chromosom
e aberrations in vitro and sister chromatid exchanges in vivo. These o
verlaps may indicate mechanistic similarities between the induction of
chromosomal malsegregation and other toxicological phenomena. The pre
dictivity of the SAR model derived from the present data base is relat
ively low, however. This may be merely a reflection of the small size
and composition of the data base, however, further analyses suggest th
at it reflects primarily the multiple mechanisms responsible for the i
nduction of chromosomal malsegregation in yeast and the complexity of
the phenomenon.