Objective. Despite uncertain validity as a measure of cost, Medicaid r
eimbursement may be used to compare the costs of different pediatric i
nterventions. We explored the credibility of Medicaid reimbursements a
s a measure of the costs of inpatient care associated with two differe
nt approaches to follow-up care for high-risk indigent infants. Design
. Analysis of Medicaid reimbursements within a randomized trial of pri
mary follow-up care. Patients. Infants 1500 g at birth in a large coun
ty hospital (Parkland Memorial Hospital). Intervention. Conventional c
are after nursery discharge (with well-baby care and care for chronic
illnesses provided in our follow-up clinic) or primary care (with care
for acute illnesses also provided in the follow-up clinic). Measures
to prevent a lapse in Medicaid coverage were included in all clinic vi
sits. Outcome-Measures. The completeness, comparability, and plausibil
ity of Medicaid reimbursements for inpatient care of the two groups be
tween nursery discharge and 1 year adjusted age. Results. A high perce
ntage (90% to 91%) of both groups were enrolled in Medicaid. However,
with fewer clinic visits in the conventional care group, Medicaid cove
rage often lapsed in this group, particularly among the highest risk i
nfants. As a result, the proportion of hospital days reimbursed by Med
icaid was substantially lower for conventional care than primary care
infants (53% [92/174] vs 96% [298/310]). An even larger disparity was
observed for pediatric intensive care days (10% [6/61] vs 100% [33/33]
). Implausible Medicaid reimbursements included a lower reimbursement
rate per day in the pediatric intensive care unit than on the pediatri
c floor (1 infant), a lower reimbursement rate per day for hospital ca
re than home care (1 infant), and a mean reimbursement rate per day fo
r our private pediatric teaching hospital ($1244/day) that did not exc
eed that for the private nonteaching pediatric hospital ($1268/day). T
he reimbursement rate for our public teaching hospital was particularl
y low ($507/day) despite a high acuity of illness (21% of hospital day
s in the pediatric intensive care unit). Conclusions. Without proper v
alidation, reimbursements from Medicaid (or any program that replaces
it) should not be assumed to provide an unbiased or acceptably accurat
e measure of the relative or absolute cost of pediatric health care in
terventions.