IMPORTANCE OF PLANT ARCHITECTURE AND PLANT-DENSITY FOR ROSE CROP PERFORMANCE

Authors
Citation
Mtn. Kool, IMPORTANCE OF PLANT ARCHITECTURE AND PLANT-DENSITY FOR ROSE CROP PERFORMANCE, Journal of Horticultural Science, 72(2), 1997, pp. 195-203
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Horticulture
ISSN journal
00221589
Volume
72
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
195 - 203
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-1589(1997)72:2<195:IOPAAP>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
The relationships between plant architecture and flower production of rose were studied for a cropping period of 2.5 years. Four types of pl ants, varying in number of basal shoots and their architecture were cr eated, which were combined with three plant densities (7.7-11.6 and 17 .4 plants per m(2)). Plant-architecture was mainly managed by manipula tion of the basal-shoot formation in combination with height of prunin g and deshooting practices. The investment in stem mass significantly reduced the number and weight of flowers for the first eight months. T his was due to a delay in time of basal shoot growth, restriction of n umber of outgrowing shoots and disbudding of shoots. However, this ini tial financial loss of about DFl 20 per m(2) amply paid itself in the next two cropping years. Regression analyses showed that number and di ameter of second-order laterals as formed after eight months, could ex plain more than 70% of the variation in number and weight of flowers h arvested in more than two cropping years. mower production was much le ss related to the number and diameter of basal shoots than to number a nd diameter of second-order laterals. The importance of the diameter a nd cross-sectional areas of shoots of different heights with respect t o assimilate storage and transport capacity is discussed in relation t o flower production. Increasing plant densities lead to a higher bioma ss and more flower production but with a reduced individual plant weig ht. Furthermore, weight of harvested flowers was reduced. The harvest index was neither affected by the applied treatments nor by plant dens ity.