This study evaluates the selective-listening task (SLT) originally dev
eloped by Gopher and Kahneman (1971). A brief analysis of the abilitie
s measured by the SLT is presented, and investigations involving Royal
Netherlands Air Force aviator applicants and Royal Netherlands Navy a
ir traffic control applicants are reported. Task performance of sample
s from both populations (N = 175 and N = 87, respectively) correlated
significantly with subsequent pass-fail in training (r = .34). Increme
ntal validity of the SLT is demonstrated by (a) the absence of signifi
cant correlations with other operational selection tests and (b) a mul
tiple regression analysis showing that the SLT explained a significant
amount of residual variance not explained by the existing operational
tests. We conclude that the SLT increases the assessment potential of
an existing selection battery. However, we recommend simplifying the
scoring procedure and suggest ways to increase the validity.