L. Nyssen, THE EUROPEAN-UNION OSTPOLITIK IN THE LIGH T OF THE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT WITH THE CZECH-REPUBLIC, Revue d'etudes comparatives Est-Ouest, 27(4), 1996, pp. 15
Despite the apparent generosity of the EU's association proposals (ext
ensive political dialogue, asymmetrical liberalization of trade), Cent
ral and Eastern European countries (CEEC) have often voiced their grie
vances with regard to the Union's Ostpolitik. This misunderstanding pr
obably has arisen because the EU has not always sufficiently reckoned
with the psychological impediments and sensitivity that still characte
rize relations between countries in this region. For instance, certain
CEECs - considering themselves to be farther ahead in political and e
conomic reforms - refuse to be treated like the others. This partly ac
counts for the Czech Republic's refusal to have a modified suspensory
clause inserted in the Association Agreement that it had to renegotiat
e following the breakup of Czechoslovakia. This demand for differentia
ted treatment also explains why some members of the Visegrad group hav
e reserves about extending their free-trade zone farther east. The EU'
s new approach to admitting CEECs suggests a solution to the dilemma i
t has encountered when defining its Ostpolitik. By recognizing that al
l these countries may eventually join, the EU has calmed those that di
d not want to see a new wall dividing Europe. But by subordinating a c
ountry's application for membership to an examination of its own accom
plishments (and not that of the group of which it is a part), the EU m
akes it possible for the more advanced countries to hope for a faster
pace of integration.