Information about dietary behaviors, attitudes, and knowledge is impor
tant for state and local health agencies because national monitoring l
acks the local representativeness and timeliness necessary to catalyze
community interest and to design, target, and evaluate dietary interv
ention programs. Currently, however, both methods and resources are li
mited for surveying diet in the population of a state or community. Br
ief assessments are included in the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance S
ystem for adolescents, which is conducted by state departments of educ
ation, and in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adult
s, which is operated by state departments of health. More quantitative
ly precise measurements are being made by a few stales and communities
but personnel and financial resources for such surveys are limited. N
utritionists in state and local health agencies should explore the pos
sibility of developing public-private partnerships with food producers
, retailers, and marketers to collect information about dietary determ
inants and behaviors in states and communities. Better standardization
of dietary assessment methods is needed, asis development of better m
ethods to identify attitudes about diet and barriers to dietary improv
ement. Most important, though, dietary surveillance in stales and comm
unities must be more strongly tied to intervention programs intended t
o improve nutrition in those populations.