A PRODUCTION TASK EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN MENTAL ADDITION SKILL DEVELOPMENT - INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL VALIDATION OF CHRONOMETRIC MODELS

Citation
Td. Little et Kf. Widaman, A PRODUCTION TASK EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN MENTAL ADDITION SKILL DEVELOPMENT - INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL VALIDATION OF CHRONOMETRIC MODELS, Journal of experimental child psychology, 60(3), 1995, pp. 361-392
Citations number
63
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Experimental","Psychology, Developmental
ISSN journal
00220965
Volume
60
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
361 - 392
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-0965(1995)60:3<361:APTEOI>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
A production task paradigm for obtaining reaction times to mental addi tion stimuli was used for internal and external validation of chronome tric models of mental addition processing. The first analysis explored the internal validity of extant chronometric models and found that th ree models, (a) a tabular memory network retrieval strategy (PRODUCT), (b) a nontabular memory network retrieval strategy (ERROR RATE), and (c) a computational strategy (MIN), were able to encompass individual differences in strategy choice for 155 individuals from Grades 2 to 8 and 111 college students. Patterns of convergent and discriminant vali dity for these models were also demonstrated. The second analysis expl ored the external validity of relations among (a) two traditionally me asured factor analytic dimensions of ability, Numerical Facility and P erceptual Speed; (b) two information processing dimensions presumed to underlie mental addition, Addition Efficiency and Speediness; and (c) a digit-span measure of Short-Term Memory. We specified a series of t wo-group (grade school and college) structural equation models to repr esent the relations among all measures and showed that individual diff erences in the apparently calculative processes that underlie the trad itionally defined ability dimension of Numerical Facility are highly r elated to individual differences in Addition Efficiency and Speediness of information processing. (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc.