Recent widely publicized studies claim facilities for treatment, stora
ge, and disposal of hazardous wastes (TSDFs) are located in areas with
higher than average proportion, of minorities, thereby exposing minor
ities to relatively greater levels of potential risk. These claims hav
e influenced national policies and public perceptions. This article re
visits those claims in the first national study of TSDFs to use census
tract-level data, finding no consistent and statistically significant
differences in the racial or ethnic composition of tracts that contai
n commercial TSDFs and those that do not. Aggregating tracts surroundi
ng TSDF tract locations, the authors find that the claims of the previ
ous studies rest on using larger areal aggregates (zip code areas) on
the peripheries of which the densities of minority populations are hig
her The authors conclude that whether minorities are exposed to greate
r risk depends on how distance from TSDF sites is related to that risk
an issue on which there is currently little knowledge.