Lg. Larsson et al., BENEFITS AND LIABILITIES OF HYPERMOBILITY IN THE BACK PAIN DISORDERS OF INDUSTRIAL-WORKERS, Journal of internal medicine, 238(5), 1995, pp. 461-467
Objectives. Back pain disorders, sometimes called 'the nemesis of medi
cine and the albatross of industry', are ubiquitous, but have stubborn
ly defied diagnosis and treatment. Hypermobility syndrome, which is al
so very common, has been called 'an enigma of human physiology', Both
conditions have attracted wide attention and interest only recently. I
n an earlier study, we considered the benefits and liabilities of join
t hypermobility by studying 660 musicians in the USA, In a parallel ma
nner, the present study analysed the back pain disorders of 606 worker
s in a Swedish high-technology industrial plant in the context of spin
al hypermobility, Subjects and methods. The 606 industrial workers wer
e examined for spinal hypermobility using a standard protocol, and int
erviewed for work-related body-posture requirements and the low back,
shoulder and neck pain disorders experienced by them. The data were an
alysed for associations between hypermobility and physical complaints
as a whole, and by taking into account gender and body-postures at wor
k. Results. Twenty-six per cent (37) of 144 workers with hypermobility
but only 14% (64) of 453 without hypermobility experienced back pain
(P < 0.002), Among the 326 workers with sitting or standing jabs, 40%
(29) of 71 with hypermobility had back pain, whereas only 12% (30) of
the 255 without hypermobility experienced back pain (P < 0.001), The c
orresponding numbers with back pain for 235 in jobs with changing body
-postures were 4.5% (3) of 66 with hypermobility and 14% (14) of 169 w
ithout hypermobility (P = 0.04). Conclusions, Hypermobility of the spi
ne is an asset if the work requires change of body-posture, but a liab
ility for those in a standing or sitting assignment. It reinforces a s
imilar hypothesis proposed by Larsson et al.