Ek. Mulholland et al., A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF CHLORAMPHENICOL VS TRIMETHOPRIM-SULFAMETHOXAZOLE FOR THE TREATMENT OF MALNOURISHED CHILDREN WITH COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA, The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 14(11), 1995, pp. 959-965
Children in developing countries who present with malnutrition often h
ave infections, particularly pneumonia, at the time of presentation. W
e evaluated the initial antibiotic management of 144 Gambian children
who presented for the first time with malnutrition and who had clinica
l or radiologic evidence of pneumonia. They were enrolled in a double
blind trial of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole vs. chloramphenicol. Most
children in the study underwent detailed investigations of bacterial
and viral etiology as part of another study. The study drug was admini
stered for a week along with oral metronidazole, vitamins and standard
ized nutritional therapy. Treatment failure was defined as the need fo
r change to parenteral antibiotics during treatment, failure to respon
d to a week of treatment with the study drug or relapse during the fol
lowing 2 weeks. There were no differences between the treatment groups
in the clinical indicators of severity, etiology or radiologic findin
gs. Thirty-three children were excluded from the analysis because of t
uberculosis, inappropriate enrollment or inadequate follow up. Of the
111 children remaining, 32 (16 in each arm of the study) failed treatm
ent. Clinical failure was not related to in vitro antimicrobial resist
ance in the 20 cases in which invasive bacterial isolates were obtaine
d. Those who failed treatment were more likely to have had lower chest
wall indrawing and positive bacterial cultures than those who were su
ccessfully treated. In an area with infrequent antimicrobial resistanc
e of common respiratory pathogens, oral chloramphenicol and trimethopr
im-sulfamethoxazole were equally effective in the initial management o
f malnourished children with community-acquired pneumonia.