1. The densities of common cranes Grus grus in 10 zones of a wintering
area were approximately proportional to the amounts of food resources
, but some overuse of the zones with highest food densities was observ
ed, i.e. greater numbers of birds than expected used these zones. The
distribution resembled ideal free distribution only after numbers of c
ranes had exceeded carrying capacity. The seasonal pattern of settleme
nt deviated from ideal free distribution. During the early and late pa
rt of the season, when there were fewer birds at the study site, crane
s preferred to forage as close to the roost as possible provided that
there was enough food, instead of selecting the zones further away wit
h highest food densities. 2. However, 12 individually marked cranes di
ffered in their competitive ability and foraging area selection. Large
r adult birds were dominant in aggressive encounters, displacing subdo
minant cranes from good feeding positions. Food intake rate of dominan
t cranes tended to be higher than the hock average, the difference inc
reasing with rank. Dominant cranes preferred to forage in the zones wi
th highest food densities and had higher absolute daily food intakes.
The relative pay-offs of different phenotypes changed across zones wit
h different food densities: subordinate birds could not increase their
intake rate at the richest zones as much as dominants. 3. The average
daily food intake of a crane was thus positively correlated with both
the quality of the foraging zone and the dominance rank of the bird.
These results fulfil most assumptions and predictions of the interfere
nce phenotype-limited distribution model, although truncation of pheno
types between zones was imperfect.