Background. Most traumatic colon injuries can be repaired primarily, b
ut a colostomy may still be required for severe colonic or rectal inju
ry. The current trend is to reverse the colostomy early, rather than t
o wait the traditional 3 months before closure. Methods. Forty-nine pa
tients with colostomies after abdominal trauma were entered into the s
tudy. All patients had undergone a contrast enema in the second postop
erative week to assess distal colon healing. Patients were excluded fr
om early closure for nonhealing of the bowel injury, unresolving wound
sepsis, or an unstable condition. We then compared the outcome of the
remaining 38 (77.6%) patients allocated to either an early or a late
colostomy group in a controlled, prospective, randomized trial. Result
s. We found no significant difference in morbidity between the two gro
ups, with an overall complication rate of 26.3%. Technically the early
closure of colostomies was far easier than late closure and required
significantly less operating time (p = 0.036) and with less intraopera
tive blood loss (p = 0.020). The closure of end colostomies was more t
ime consuming, both early (p < 0.001) and late (p < 0.001) and caused
more bleeding (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Total hospitali
zation was marginally shorter overall for early closure, but late clos
ure of end colostomies resulted in prolonged hospitalization (p = 0.02
3). Conclusions. The early closure of colostomies aid the use of loop
colostomies whenever possible are recommended as both safe and benefic
ial for patients with colonic injury after trauma. Contraindications f
or early closure include nonhealing distal bowel, persistent wound sep
sis, or persistent postoperative instability.