R. Kodnani et al., EVALUATION OF POLYMERIC COATINGS FOR MCM APPLICATIONS, IEEE transactions on components, packaging, and manufacturing technology. Part B, Advanced packaging, 18(4), 1995, pp. 658-665
An effort was initiated under the Reliability without Hermeticity (Rwo
H) project to evaluate the performance of nonhermetic coatings for mul
tichip module (MCM) applications. As a means of selecting coating mate
rials, Sandia ATC01 test chips, with and without chip passivation (SiN
), were coated with three nonhermetic polymer materials: a silicone ge
l, a filled epoxy, and a polyimide. Some of the coated parts were prec
onditioned (500 temperature cycles and 96 h of salt spray), and some w
ere not. The coated parts were subjected to either pressure cooker tes
t (PCT-121 degrees C, 99.6%RH, no bias) or temperature-humidity-bias (
THB-85 degrees C, 85%RH, 40 V bias) tests, for 7000 and 10 000 h, resp
ectively. In this paper, the moisture protection performance of the co
atings on nonpassivated test chips is presented in detail. In addition
, some overall comparisons of the failures in passivated and nonpassiv
ated chips are given. For the preconditioned parts, THE median lives (
times to 50% failures) in excess of 10 000 h were obtained for the epo
xy and the gel coatings. Polyimides exhibited a THE median life of 695
0 h. In PCT, the three coatings exhibited similar median lives in the
range of 350-400 h, but, much different failure kinetics. Based on ear
lier published studies, these median lives are representative of good
coating performance. The failures in the nonpreconditioned coated part
s were much lower (20-50%) for the gel and the polyimide coatings, at
the end of THE tests. Epoxies on the other hand did not exhibit such i
nfluence of preconditioning steps on failures. The comparison of passi
vated and nonpassivated coated ATC01's revealed that the presence of p
assivation enhances the moisture protection performance of all three c
oatings. This effect was especially pronounced for the silicone gel.