Lp. Briggs et al., THE IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL HISTORIES FOR ASSESSING SEXUALLY-TRANSMITTEDDISEASE RISK, Sexually transmitted diseases, 22(6), 1995, pp. 348-350
Background: Although identifying risk groups for sexually transmitted
diseases based on age or race may be useful for targeting screening ef
forts, clinicians should recognize that even members of most ''low-ris
k'' groups include some individuals at higher risk of infection. Goal
of this Study: This case series of generally older people with sexuall
y transmitted diseases illustrates how assumptions regarding age and r
isk group can lead to missed opportunities for sexually transmitted di
sease prevention. Study Design: Records were compiled from two cluster
s of patients with sexually transmitted diseases seen at a Springfield
, Mass., health center between March and September 1992. Results: Nine
patients with a sexually transmitted disease (one with syphilis/human
immunodeficiency virus co-infection, one with herpes/human immunodefi
ciency virus co-infection, two with human immunodeficiency virus infec
tions, and five with syphilis) are described. Eight of the patients ar
e linked epidemiologically. Conclusions: A social history is essential
during a medical encounter for sexually transmitted disease preventio
n purposes. Relying on assumptions regarding risk groups, as well as s
exual activity, age, or other medical conditions, may lead to a patien
t's level of risk of infection going unrecognized. Discomfort associat
ed with asking the sensitive questions involved in a social history al
so is a barrier to recognizing risks or infections. Nonjudgmental sexu
al histories are appropriate when evaluating all patients.