Some liberal theorists in Great Britain and the United States have fol
lowed T. H. Marshall in defending welfare state practices with a rheto
ric of social citizenship. They argue that social rights have enhanced
freedom, promoted equality, ensured political stability and created a
common civilization for members of these polities, Yet welfare state
practices have also rendered the discourse of social citizenship ironi
c by engendering a number of opposite results. restrictions on freedom
as citizens are subject to bureaucratic and market disciplines, perpe
tuation of inequality, and fostering of political instability through
creating alienation. Liberal discourse on social citizenship thus prom
otes conservative results and reinforces the power of market and state
in ways that keep the citizen a subject.