Electrophysiological evidence shows the existence of voltage-operated
Ca2+ channels of the L- and, in some cases, T- and B-, type in the smo
oth muscle cells of major cerebral arteries and arterioles. Current in
tensity through L-type Ca2+ channels is higher in cerebral than in per
ipheral arteries, which points to a greater dependence on extracellula
r Ca2+ of contractile responses in cerebral arteries. The increase in
cytosolic Ca2+ concentration is the key event leading both to maintena
nce of basal cerebrovascular tone and to contraction of cerebral arter
ies in response to depolarization and agonist-receptor interaction. Su
ch an increase results from increased transmembrane influx of Ca2+ thr
ough L-type Ca2+ channels, as well as from the release of Ca2+ from in
tracellular Ca2+ stores. Ca2+ entry modulators (dihydropyridines, phen
ylalkylamines, benzothiazepines, and diphenylpiperazines) bind to allo
sterically coupled sites in the Ca2+ channel, thus inhibiting (Ca2+ en
try blockers) or stimulating (Ca2+ entry activators) Ca2+ influx and,
therefore, contractile responses of the cerebral arteries. In vivo, Ca
2+ entry blockers increase pial vascular caliber and cerebral blood fl
ow by their direct action on the cerebroarterial wall. However, such a
n action also takes place on several peripheral vascular beds, which l
eads to hypotension. Therefore, the brain cannot be considered a ''pri
vileged'' organ when the vasodilatatory action of Ca2+ entry blockers
is considered. Since increased cytosolic Ca2+ concentration (and, ther
efore, activation of Ca2+ channels) plays a crucial role in the pathog
enesis of ischemic brain damage (e.g., acute stroke and subarachnoid h
emorrhage), Ca2+ entry blockers could be useful cytoprotective drugs.
However, with the exception of nimodipine in the management of subarac
hnoid hemorrhage, clinical trials have yielded results that are not so
promising as one could expect from those obtained in experimental res
earch.