THERMAL-TREATMENT PARAMETERS ARE MOST PREDICTIVE OF OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH SINGLE TUMOR NODULES PER TREATMENT FIELD IN RECURRENT ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE BREAST
Ds. Kapp et Rs. Cox, THERMAL-TREATMENT PARAMETERS ARE MOST PREDICTIVE OF OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH SINGLE TUMOR NODULES PER TREATMENT FIELD IN RECURRENT ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE BREAST, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 33(4), 1995, pp. 887-899
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: In previously reported studies using radiation therapy (XRT)
and hyperthermia (HT) for treatment of superficial metastases from ade
nocarcinoma of the breast, we have identified several pretreatment and
treatment parameters that correlated with rate of initial complete re
sponse (ICR) recorded at 3 weeks and duration of local control(DLC). T
hese parameters include minimal intratumoral temperature, T-min, and t
he temperature exceeded by 90% of the measured intratumoral temperatur
es, T-90 Recently, others have shown that thermal dose defined as the
cumulative time of isoeffective treatments with T-90 = 43 degrees C (C
UM EQ MIN T-90 43) was predictive of complete response in superficial
tumors. We have assessed the prognostic value of several formulations
of this parameter for both ICR and DLC in a relatively uniform patient
population treated with XRT-HT. Methods and Materials: The correspond
ing EQ MIN T-90 43 were calculated for 332 HT treatments in 111 HT fie
lds in 83 patients who started treatment between October 1982 and May
1992. Each field contained only one measurable superficially located n
odular tumor recurrence or metastasis from adenocarcinoma of the breas
t that was treated with XRT-HT, had mapped or multiple point temperatu
res recorded, and had at least one posttreatment follow-up evaluation.
The thermal doses from all treatments delivered to a field were added
to obtain the total thermal dose, SUM EQ MIN T-90 43. Logistic and li
fe-table multivariate analyses were performed to determine which pretr
eatment parameters (including initial T-stage, prior XRT, and tumor vo
lume at the time of HT) and treatment parameters (including XRT dose,
T-min, T-90, thermal dose, and hormonal therapy) best correlated with
ICR and DLC. Results: Of the treatment parameters tested, SUM EQ MIN T
-90 43 had the strongest correlation with both ICR (p = 0.0002) and DL
C (p = 0.0014). Also, SUM EQ MIN T-90 43 contributed to the best multi
variate models predictive of ICR and DLC. Conclusion: For this relativ
ely uniform patient population, we have confirmed that SUM EQ MIN T-90
43 is the treatment parameter most strongly correlated with not only
response following XRT-HT, but also duration of local control. This fo
rmulation of thermal dose should permit prescriptions to be written fo
r HT treatments. Prospective trials designed to confirm this thermal d
ose relationship are to be encouraged.