This exploratory field study evaluated a bilingual computerized speech
-recognition cellular telephone prototype of the Center for Epidemiolo
gical Studies-Depression scale (CES-D). Thirty Spanish and 22 English
speakers completed both computer-telephone and face-to-face CES-D meth
ods and an oral depression checklist in counterbalanced order. Both la
nguage groups reported high positive ratings for the computer-telephon
e method, with the English sample preferring the computer-telephone ov
er the face-to-face method. In both samples, the computer-telephone me
thod yielded high internal consistency estimates, strong alternate for
m reliabilities, and similar high correlations to the depression check
list. Both groups reported significantly elevated scores with the comp
uter-telephone method, but total score variances for both methods did
not differ. Computer-telephone limitations included occasional misreco
gnitions and template training constraints.