Macroeconomics is gender-biased because of its neglect of the reproduc
tive sector. This neglect is formalized in the assumptions, supporting
most macroeconomic models, that population and the mapping from popul
ation to the labor force are determined exogenously. The use of these
assumptions is demonstrated for the case of the aggregate growth model
s which have evolved from Harrod's original contribution. In addition,
the development growth literature is shown to harbor a similar neglec
t. Some suggestions are made as to how these assumptions might be rela
xed and some elements of a consequent theory and data project outlined
.