This is a study of 1,093 adolescents who attended public high schools
in rural Arkansas; Little Rock Arkansas; or Baltimore, Maryland. The r
esults do not support the hypothesis that antiascetic behaviors are mo
re affected by religiosity than are criminal behaviors. Nor does the s
tudy support the theoretical hypothesis that religiosity is an anteced
ent factor that has effects that are fully mediated through other more
proximate elements of social control It also finds few real differenc
es in the effects of religiosity on various forms of delinquency betwe
en Baltimore, Maryland; Little Rock, Arkansas; and rural areas of Arka
nsas. Implications of the study are discussed.