The inertial load flow technique [2] is applied to a dynamic equivalen
t [1] derived from a NERC (North American Electric Reliability Council
) data base to compute maximum tie line power flows for a 1980 MW loss
of generation at the Nanticoke station in the Ontario Hydro system. T
he results were compared with a transient stability simulation and rec
orded tie line power and frequency measurements. The inertial load flo
w results were more accurate in capturing the filtered measurements of
power flows during the first three to five seconds after a loss of ge
neration contingency than the transient stability simulation. The tran
sient stability simulation was shown to contain both synchronizing osc
illations between generators as well as the quasi steady-state behavio
r captured by the filtered power measurements and inertial load flow.
The inertial load flow is an excellent tool for estimating proximity t
o voltage collapse since the field current limiters on exciters utiliz
e filtered measurements of the inertial response that occurs 3-5 secon
ds after a loss of generation contingency. The loss of voltage control
and reactive generation supply due to action of field current limiter
s is a principle cause of loss of voltage stability in power systems.
The inertiaI response is shown to capture a filtered estimate of the p
eak of the deceleration wave that propagates from the point of disturb
ance and would indicate whether the filtered estimate of these peak re
al power flows would incur sufficient filtered generator field current
levels to cause field current limiters to act. Generator field curren
t levels rise in an attempt to counteract voltage decline and increase
in reactive losses caused by the peak power flows that are observed i
n the inertial response. The action of the field current limiter reduc
es field current and reactive supply to prevent thermal damage to the
generator. The action of field current limiters initiates the voltage
decline that can result in voltage collapse.