APPLICATION OF INERTIAL LOAD TO A LOSS OF GENERATOR POSTMORTEM

Citation
Ra. Schlueter et al., APPLICATION OF INERTIAL LOAD TO A LOSS OF GENERATOR POSTMORTEM, Electric machines and power systems, 23(6), 1995, pp. 717-738
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Eletrical & Electronic
ISSN journal
0731356X
Volume
23
Issue
6
Year of publication
1995
Pages
717 - 738
Database
ISI
SICI code
0731-356X(1995)23:6<717:AOILTA>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
The inertial load flow technique [2] is applied to a dynamic equivalen t [1] derived from a NERC (North American Electric Reliability Council ) data base to compute maximum tie line power flows for a 1980 MW loss of generation at the Nanticoke station in the Ontario Hydro system. T he results were compared with a transient stability simulation and rec orded tie line power and frequency measurements. The inertial load flo w results were more accurate in capturing the filtered measurements of power flows during the first three to five seconds after a loss of ge neration contingency than the transient stability simulation. The tran sient stability simulation was shown to contain both synchronizing osc illations between generators as well as the quasi steady-state behavio r captured by the filtered power measurements and inertial load flow. The inertial load flow is an excellent tool for estimating proximity t o voltage collapse since the field current limiters on exciters utiliz e filtered measurements of the inertial response that occurs 3-5 secon ds after a loss of generation contingency. The loss of voltage control and reactive generation supply due to action of field current limiter s is a principle cause of loss of voltage stability in power systems. The inertiaI response is shown to capture a filtered estimate of the p eak of the deceleration wave that propagates from the point of disturb ance and would indicate whether the filtered estimate of these peak re al power flows would incur sufficient filtered generator field current levels to cause field current limiters to act. Generator field curren t levels rise in an attempt to counteract voltage decline and increase in reactive losses caused by the peak power flows that are observed i n the inertial response. The action of the field current limiter reduc es field current and reactive supply to prevent thermal damage to the generator. The action of field current limiters initiates the voltage decline that can result in voltage collapse.