MODULATION OF PHOSPHOLIPASE A(2) - IDENTIFICATION OF AN INACTIVE MEMBRANE-BOUND STATE

Citation
Wr. Burack et al., MODULATION OF PHOSPHOLIPASE A(2) - IDENTIFICATION OF AN INACTIVE MEMBRANE-BOUND STATE, Biochemistry, 34(45), 1995, pp. 14819-14828
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00062960
Volume
34
Issue
45
Year of publication
1995
Pages
14819 - 14828
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-2960(1995)34:45<14819:MOPA-I>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Phospholipase A(2)-catalyzed hydrolysis of vesicular phospholipid has been used to model the modulation of an enzyme's function by membrane properties. Phospholipase A(2)'s (PLA(2)) kinetics toward large unilam ellar vesicles (LUV) composed of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) are anomalous; there is a slow initial phase of catalysis (a lag) whi ch ends abruptly with a sudden increase in the catalytic rate (a burst ). The sudden increase in activity is due to the accumulation of a cri tical mole fraction of reaction product. When the concentration of pro duct exceeds this critical mole fraction, the mixture of reaction prod ucts and substrate undergoes compositional phase separation. In this w ork, we address the molecular details of the coupling between composit ional phase separation and activation of PLA(2). A prominent model for this coupling is that compositional phase separation leads to a surfa ce for which PLA(2) has increased affinity, resulting in the recruitme nt of PLA(2) from solution to the surface. Here, we show that the bulk of PLA(2) is associated with the membrane at a time well before the a brupt increase in catalytic rate. This finding indicates that there mu st be a relatively inactive, membrane-bound state. Furthermore, PLA(2) 's kinetics are anomalous even when the substrate comprises a surface to which PLA(2) is bound throughout the time course. With DPPC LUV as the substrate, detailed time courses show that the description of the time course as a lag and a burst is inadequate. Instead, the time cour se consists of multiple phases of acceleration and deceleration. The d ata presented here suggest that all these various changes in catalytic rate may be due to product-induced changes in membrane properties. In particular, we suggest that nonequilibrium, microheterogeneities of l ipid composition may underlie these very complicated kinetics.