Purpose: A prospective study was undertaken of all vascular laboratory
tests performed by the ''on-call'' technologist during a 3-year time
period. Methods: Technologists take call on a rotating basis. All pati
ents evaluated had symptoms. History and risk factor data were collect
ed at the time of patient encounter. Results: Studies were initiated f
rom the emergency department 56% of the time, from inpatient examinati
ons 33% of the time, and from outpatient examinations 11% of the time.
Ninety percent (n = 440) of the studies obtained were venous duplex s
cans (VDS). Fifty-eight percent (257 of 440) of the studies were perfo
rmed on weekends. Thirty-two percent of the studies resulted in admiss
ion of the patient. Of the 440 VDS obtained, 51% (224 of 440) identifi
ed some type of disease. Acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was diagno
sed in 15% (67 of 440), acute superficial venous thrombosis (SVT) in 4
% (17 of 440), acute DVT and SVT in 7% (31 of 440), chronic DVT in 4%
(17 of 440), chronic SVT in 4% (16 of 440), and chronic DVT and SVT in
1% (3 of 440); 2% (9 of 440) of the DVTs were of indeterminate age. O
ther diseases were identified in 22% (95 of 440), including popliteal
cysts, inguinal lymphadenopathy, and soft tissue edema. Conclusions: H
aving an ''on-call'' vascular technologist has allowed patients with a
cute venous thrombosis to be triaged and admitted, if necessary, in a
timely fashion. Those patients who have symptoms and a negative VDS re
sult are able to avoid unnecessary hospitalization and treatment. The
expense of this service is easily justified by the savings of unnecess
ary hospital days.