EFFECT OF GROUP-SIZE ON FEEDING-BEHAVIOR, SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR, AND PERFORMANCE OF GROWING PIGS USING SINGLE-SPACE FEEDERS

Citation
Bl. Nielsen et al., EFFECT OF GROUP-SIZE ON FEEDING-BEHAVIOR, SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR, AND PERFORMANCE OF GROWING PIGS USING SINGLE-SPACE FEEDERS, Livestock production science, 44(1), 1995, pp. 73-85
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience
ISSN journal
03016226
Volume
44
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
73 - 85
Database
ISI
SICI code
0301-6226(1995)44:1<73:EOGOFS>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Use of computerized feed intake recording (CFIR) equipment allows auto matic recording of individual feed intake of animals kept in groups. H owever, current CFIR systems have only one feeding space per social gr oup which may lead to increased competition for access to the feeder. The present experiment examined the effect of increased competition ar ound a single-space feeder on individual performance and behaviour by manipulating the number of pigs per feeder. 150 male crossbred pigs we re penned at 34+/-0.3 kg (mean+/-SE) in groups of 5, 10, 15, or 20 for 29 days with one single-space computerized feeder per pen and 1.06 m( 2)/pig. Pigs kept in groups of 20 made fewer but longer visits to the feeder and ate more and faster than pigs kept in the smaller groups (7 .1 vs. 14.3 visits/day, P < 0.01; 6.91 vs. 4.64 min/visit, P < 0.05; 2 14 vs. 119 g/visit, P < 0.05; 31.6 vs. 25.9 g/min, P < 0.05; means of group size 20 vs. means of group size 5, 10, and 15, respectively). No differences were found between group sizes in daily feed intake, dail y live-weight gain and feed conversion ratio (overall means: 1490 g/da y, 725 g/day and 2.09 g/g, respectively), Mean number of aggressive in teractions initiated and won were significantly lower for the two larg est group sizes on the day of grouping. A rank index based on pairwise aggressive interactions was not correlated to any of the production o r feeding behaviour variables. No significant effect of group size was found on mean number of attempts to displace other pigs from the feed er. The change in feeding pattern in the largest groups appears to rep resent an adaptation to the constraint placed on their feeding behavio ur and they succeed in adjusting to the lack of feeding space as there were no significant differences between groups in production variable s. A correlation between performance and social behaviour may have bee n disguised by environmental factors such as space allowance and straw provision or, alternatively, aggression and growth may be independent characteristics.