Bl. Nielsen et al., EFFECT OF GROUP-SIZE ON FEEDING-BEHAVIOR, SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR, AND PERFORMANCE OF GROWING PIGS USING SINGLE-SPACE FEEDERS, Livestock production science, 44(1), 1995, pp. 73-85
Use of computerized feed intake recording (CFIR) equipment allows auto
matic recording of individual feed intake of animals kept in groups. H
owever, current CFIR systems have only one feeding space per social gr
oup which may lead to increased competition for access to the feeder.
The present experiment examined the effect of increased competition ar
ound a single-space feeder on individual performance and behaviour by
manipulating the number of pigs per feeder. 150 male crossbred pigs we
re penned at 34+/-0.3 kg (mean+/-SE) in groups of 5, 10, 15, or 20 for
29 days with one single-space computerized feeder per pen and 1.06 m(
2)/pig. Pigs kept in groups of 20 made fewer but longer visits to the
feeder and ate more and faster than pigs kept in the smaller groups (7
.1 vs. 14.3 visits/day, P < 0.01; 6.91 vs. 4.64 min/visit, P < 0.05; 2
14 vs. 119 g/visit, P < 0.05; 31.6 vs. 25.9 g/min, P < 0.05; means of
group size 20 vs. means of group size 5, 10, and 15, respectively). No
differences were found between group sizes in daily feed intake, dail
y live-weight gain and feed conversion ratio (overall means: 1490 g/da
y, 725 g/day and 2.09 g/g, respectively), Mean number of aggressive in
teractions initiated and won were significantly lower for the two larg
est group sizes on the day of grouping. A rank index based on pairwise
aggressive interactions was not correlated to any of the production o
r feeding behaviour variables. No significant effect of group size was
found on mean number of attempts to displace other pigs from the feed
er. The change in feeding pattern in the largest groups appears to rep
resent an adaptation to the constraint placed on their feeding behavio
ur and they succeed in adjusting to the lack of feeding space as there
were no significant differences between groups in production variable
s. A correlation between performance and social behaviour may have bee
n disguised by environmental factors such as space allowance and straw
provision or, alternatively, aggression and growth may be independent
characteristics.