K. Detjen et al., MUSCARINIC ACETYLCHOLINE-RECEPTOR DOWN-REGULATION LIMITS THE EXTENT OF INHIBITION OF CELL-CYCLE PROGRESSION IN CHINESE-HAMSTER OVARY CELLS, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Statesof America, 92(24), 1995, pp. 10929-10933
Cellular desensitization is believed to be important for growth contro
l but direct evidence is lacking. In the current study we compared eff
ects of wild-type and down-regulation-resistant mutant m3 muscarinic r
eceptors on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cell desensitization, proli
feration, and transformation. We found that down-regulation of m3 musc
arinic acetylcholine receptors was the principal mechanism of desensit
ization of receptor-activated inositol phosphate phospholipid hydrolys
is in these cells. Activation of wild-type and mutant receptors inhibi
ted anchorage-independent growth as assayed by colony formation in aga
r. However, the potency for inhibition of anchorage-independent growth
was greater for cells expressing the mutant receptor. Activation of e
ither receptor also initially inhibited anchorage-dependent cell proli
feration in randomly growing populations. Rates of DNA synthesis and c
ell division were profoundly reduced by carbachol in cells expressing
either receptor at early time points. Analysis of cell cycle parameter
s indicated that cell cycle progression was inhibited at transitions f
rom G(1) to S and G(2)/M to G(1) phases. However, mutant receptor effe
cts on anchorage-dependent growth were sustained, whereas wild-type re
ceptor effects were transient. Thus, receptor down-regulation restored
cell cycle progression. In contrast, activation of either receptor bl
ocked entry into the cell cycle from quiescence, and this response was
not reduced by receptor down-regulation. Therefore, activation of m3
muscarinic acetylcholine receptors inhibited CHO cell anchorage-depend
ent and -independent growth. In anchored cells carbachol inhibited the
cell cycle at three distinct points. Inhibitions at two of these poin
ts were eliminated by wild-type receptor down-regulation while the oth
er was not. These results directly demonstrate that desensitization me
chanisms can act as principal determinants of cellular growth response
s.