PROCESS DISSOCIATION, SINGLE-PROCESS THEORIES, AND RECOGNITION MEMORY

Citation
R. Ratcliff et al., PROCESS DISSOCIATION, SINGLE-PROCESS THEORIES, AND RECOGNITION MEMORY, Journal of experimental psychology. General, 124(4), 1995, pp. 352-374
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Experimental
ISSN journal
00963445
Volume
124
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
352 - 374
Database
ISI
SICI code
0096-3445(1995)124:4<352:PDSTAR>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
According to the assumptions of L. L. Jacoby's (1991) process dissocia tion method, performance in recognition memory is determined by the co mbination of an unconscious familiarity process and a conscious intent ional recollection process. The process dissociation method is used to produce estimates of the contributions of the 2 components to recogni tion performance. This article investigates whether the method provide s the correct estimates of components if performance actually depends on only a single process or on 2 processes different from those assume d by the method. The SAM model (G. Gillund & R. M. Shiffrin, 1984) was used to produce simulated data based on a single process. Variants of SAM with 2 processes and R. C. Atkinson and J. F. Juola's (1973) 2-pr ocess model were used to produce data based on 2 processes.