PERINATAL AND INFANT POSTMORTEM EXAMINATIONS - HOW WELL ARE WE DOING

Citation
Gm. Vujanic et al., PERINATAL AND INFANT POSTMORTEM EXAMINATIONS - HOW WELL ARE WE DOING, Journal of Clinical Pathology, 48(11), 1995, pp. 998-1001
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology
ISSN journal
00219746
Volume
48
Issue
11
Year of publication
1995
Pages
998 - 1001
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9746(1995)48:11<998:PAIPE->2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Aim-To investigate the quality of perinatal and infant necropsies and assess the relation between the quality and value of this investigatio n in different outcome groups. Methods-Cohort analysis of 540 deaths d uring 1993 of babies between 20 weeks' gestation and one year of age b orn to women usually resident in Wales, Cases were identified from the All Wales Perinatal Survey. Each case was assessed to establish wheth er the necropsy yielded clinically relevant information. The quality o f necropsy was assessed by scoring aspects identified as being part of the necropsy. Results-Necropsy was performed in 335 (62%) cases, and the report was available for assessment in 314 cases. The quality of n ecropsy was below the minimum standard in 46% (143/314) of cases. The highest quality necropsies were carried out on fetal deaths at 20 to 2 3 weeks' gestation (12% (10/85) below standard), compared with 65% (87 /133) below standard on stillbirths and 68% (21/31) on sudden unexpect ed infant death. Overall, 42% (131/314) of necropsies were performed i n a regional paediatric pathology centre including 88% (76/88) of feta l deaths, 23% (31/133) of still-births and 30% (29/96) of infant death s. The quality score for the necropsy performed in a regional centre f ailed to achieve the minimum acceptable score in 8% (11/131) of cases compared with 72% (132/182) for those done elsewhere. The cause of dea th was detected by necropsy in 17% (52/314) of cases. The quality of n ecropsy was significantly higher when the cause of death was revealed than when nothing new was found. Conclusions-The overall quality of th e perinatal and infant necropsy is poor. This is regrettable as valuab le information can be revealed frequently by a good quality necropsy. Adherence to Guidelines for Postmortem Reports recently published by t he Royal College of Pathologists should improve the situation.