The importance of wildlife conservation in the agricultural Midwest ha
s long been recognized. Likewise, the impact of habitat fragmentation
within human-perturbed landscapes has received increased attention. Th
eoretically there exists an optimum degree of fragmentation at the lan
dscape scale (e.g. to maintain both interior and edge species) that wi
ll permit an integrative approach to sustainable agriculture, as well
as to conserve biotic diversity at a greater spatial and temporal scal
e. We propose a method for comparing biotic diversity within and betwe
en fragmented landscapes. This method encompasses both natural and hum
an-subsidized components of the landscape mosaic. A sustainable landsc
ape approach to conserving biotic diversity will require the cooperati
on of land-use planners, public land owners, policy makers, resource m
anagers, and wildlife biologists, to name a few, at a scale seldom add
ressed in a human-dominated landscape. We describe a representative wa
tershed (Four-Mile Creek Watershed) in Ohio and Indiana within which w
e outline an approach to wildlife habitat conservation that attempts t
o optimize biotic diversity and sustainable agricultural productivity.
A new paradigm, namely agrolandscape ecology, is needed if we are to
manage landscape elements (corridors and patches) within an agricultur
al landscape matrix. Approaches using ecological theory, hierarchy the
ory, landscape planning, and problem-solving algorithms must be integr
ated if society is to simultaneously increase habitat quality and impl
ement a sustainability approach to landscape management.