MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING MEASUREMENTS OF PITUITARY-STALK COMPRESSION AND DEVIATION IN PATIENTS WITH NONPROLACTIN-SECRETING INTRASELLAR AND PARASELLAR TUMORS - LACK OF CORRELATION WITH SERUM PROLACTIN LEVELS
Mv. Smith et Er. Laws, MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING MEASUREMENTS OF PITUITARY-STALK COMPRESSION AND DEVIATION IN PATIENTS WITH NONPROLACTIN-SECRETING INTRASELLAR AND PARASELLAR TUMORS - LACK OF CORRELATION WITH SERUM PROLACTIN LEVELS, Neurosurgery, 34(5), 1994, pp. 834-839
PROLACTIN (PRL) LEVELS ARE frequently elevated in patients with non-PR
L-secreting adenomas or other intrasellar and parasellar diseases (''p
seudoprolactinomas''). This phenomenon is believed to result from a lo
ss of dopaminergic inhibition on pituitary lactotrophs and is known as
the ''stalk-section effect.'' Using magnetic resonance imaging scans
and a high-magnification sella technique, we measured a number of para
meters indicative of the disruption of normal sellar structures. The i
nvestigator was blind to the patient's diagnosis and PRL level while c
ollecting the data. Parameters measured were the tumor size, the angul
ar deviation of the pituitary stalk, and the degree of compression of
the pituitary stalk. Measurements were obtained from 44 patients with
pathologically confirmed tumors that had no immunohistochemical reacti
vity to PRL. PRL levels were often higher than expected. Four patients
(9%) had a PRL level of move than 150 ng/ml, and three patients (7%)
had a PRL level of 200 ng/ml or more. One patient with a plasmacytoma
eroding the sella floor had a PRL level as high as 504 ng/ml. There wa
s no significant correlation of PRL level and the degree of pituitary
stalk compression, stalk deviation, or tumor size. PRL levels were fou
nd to be markedly elevated in some patients with a tumor causing littl
e distortion of the pituitary stalk. Conversely, PRL levels were often
normal despite evidence of massive distortion of the stalk. Therefore
, magnetic resonance imaging evidence of pituitary stalk distortion ca
nnot be used to determine the diagnosis of prolactinoma versus pseudop
rolactinoma in most cases. The lack of correlation of PRL level in pat
ients with nonprolactinomas is important in view of recent doubts conc
erning the role of the ''stalk-section effect.'' A number of illustrat
ive cases are presented.