L. Laine et al., INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT AND PREDICTIVE VALUE OF ENDOSCOPIC FINDINGS FOR HELICOBACTER-PYLORI AND GASTRITIS IN NORMAL VOLUNTEERS, Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 42(5), 1995, pp. 420-423
Background: Endoscopic findings such as erythema are frequently labele
d as gastritis. We sought to determine interobserver agreement for spe
cific endoscopic features and assess the diagnostic value of features
with good agreement for Helicobacter pylori and histologic gastritis.
Methods: Fifty-two healthy subjects without ulcers, erosions, or hemor
rhages had a full endoscopy recorded on video tape. Biopsy specimens w
ere examined for H. pylori and gastritis. Two endoscopists independent
ly reviewed the tapes for predefined features (erythema, area gastrica
e, clefts, and nodularity) in the gastric body and antrum. Diagnostic
value of endoscopic features with acceptable agreement (kappa > 0.40)
was then determined for H. pylori and gastritis.Results: kappa was gre
ater than 0.40 only for prominent body area gastricae (0.49), body nod
ularity (0.65), and antral nodularity (0.68). For antral nodularity, s
ensitivity was 32%, specificity was 96%, and positive predictive value
was 90% for H. pylori. When both antral nodularity and body area gast
ricae were both present, sensitivity was only 18% but specificity and
positive predictive value were 100%. Conclusion: Interobserver agreeme
nt is poor for some features such as erythema labeled as gastritis. An
tral nodularity is a fairly reproducible finding and is very specific,
though not sensitive, for H. pylori gastritis.