SENSITIVITY OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPY COMPARED WITH ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE DETECTION OF RESIDUE OR MUCOSAL LESIONS AFTER TOPICAL GALLBLADDER STONE DISSOLUTION
Sf. Zakko et al., SENSITIVITY OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPY COMPARED WITH ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE DETECTION OF RESIDUE OR MUCOSAL LESIONS AFTER TOPICAL GALLBLADDER STONE DISSOLUTION, Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 42(5), 1995, pp. 434-438
Background: Early gallstone recurrence in some patients after ''succes
sful'' percutaneous topical dissolution may be due to residual debris.
An endoscope small enough to be introduced without dilating the exist
ing percutaneous track was used for gallbladder examination after ston
e dissolution. Methods: The sensitivity of gallbladder endoscopy was c
ompared with ultrasonography and double-contrast cholecystography for
the detection of residual debris or mucosal lesions in 18 patients who
underwent percutaneous topical dissolution. All examinations were per
formed before catheter removal and after the gallbladder was deemed st
one-free by the traditionally employed technique of single-contrast ch
olecystography. Results: Residual debris was detected in only one pati
ent by ultrasonography and in none of the 18 patients by double-contra
st cholecystography, yet endoscopy showed stone fragments ranging from
1 to 3 mm in 13 of the 18 patients. In all these patients, catheter r
epositioning and additional solvent perfusion resulted in elimination
of the debris as assessed endoscopically. Two patients had endoscopica
lly detected erosions. Double-contrast fluoroscopy found only one of t
hese, whereas ultrasonography detected neither. Conclusions: Percutane
ous gallbladder endoscopy is a more sensitive imaging modality for the
detection of residual stone debris or mucosal lesions after gallstone
dissolution.