P. Macmathuna et al., ENDOSCOPIC BALLOON SPHINCTEROPLASTY (PAPILLARY DILATION) FOR BILE-DUCT STONES - EFFICACY, SAFETY, AND FOLLOW-UP IN 100 PATIENTS, Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 42(5), 1995, pp. 468-474
Background: Because sphincterotomy accounts for a major portion of the
morbidity and mortality associated with ERCP, we have proposed endosc
opic balloon papillary dilation or sphincteroplasty as an alternative.
Methods: We report the outcome in a series of 100 patients in whom ba
lloon sphincteroplasty was attempted for bile duct stones up to 20 mm
in diameter, with a median follow-up of 16 months (range 6 to 30). Res
ults: During one ERCP session using sphincteroplasty alone, the bile d
uct was cleared in 78%, mechanical lithotripsy being required in 10% f
or stones greater than 12 mm in diameter. Incomplete duct clearance wa
s achieved in a further 4%, all of whom underwent repeat ERCP with suc
cessful duct clearance without recourse to sphincterotomy. Failure to
clear the bile duct with sphincteroplasty in the remaining 18% was pri
marily related to large stone size (> 15 mm). Sphincterotomy was requi
red to clear the duct in 7%. Another 6% comprised elderly high-risk pa
tients with multiple large stones greater than 15 mm who were treated
by stent insertion plus ursodeoxycholic acid. No papillary hemorrhage
was observed; uncomplicated pancreatitis occurred in 5%. During a medi
an follow-up of 16 months, 2% had recurrent symptomatic bile duct ston
es considered to have been unrecognized following the initial ERCP; th
ese were removed after repeat sphincteroplasty. No clinical evidence o
f papillary stenosis was observed during follow-up. Conclusions: Endos
copic balloon papillary dilation or sphincteroplasty is a safe and eff
ective alternative to sphincterotomy in the management: of bile duct s
tones less than 12 mm; larger stones may require mechanical lithotrips
y to facilitate duct clearance.