IS CORPUS-LUTEUM REGRESSION AN IMMUNE-MEDIATED EVENT - LOCALIZATION OF IMMUNE-SYSTEM COMPONENTS AND LUTEINIZING-HORMONE RECEPTOR IN HUMAN CORPORA-LUTEA
A. Bukovsky et al., IS CORPUS-LUTEUM REGRESSION AN IMMUNE-MEDIATED EVENT - LOCALIZATION OF IMMUNE-SYSTEM COMPONENTS AND LUTEINIZING-HORMONE RECEPTOR IN HUMAN CORPORA-LUTEA, Biology of reproduction, 53(6), 1995, pp. 1373-1384
Factors determining the life span of the human corpus luteum (CL) are
not known. In addition to being determined by hormonal factors, such a
s hCG, the life of luteal cells may be determined by the preservation
of luteal vascularization. Furthermore, the CL represents an immunolog
ically unique tissue, as it is formed after menarche, long after adapt
ation of the immune system toward self. Thus, CL regression may be imm
unologically mediated. To determine what role the vasculature and immu
ne system play in human CL development and regression, we examined imm
unohistochemically 1) the expression of Thy-1 differentiation protein
by vascular pericytes, 2) the expression of major histocompatibility c
omplex (MHC) class I and class II molecules in granulosa lutein cells
(GLC), and 3) infiltration of the CL by macrophages and T lymphocytes,
LH receptor (LHR) and cytokeratin 18 expression were also studied. In
developing CL, the pericytes of luteal microvasculature released Thy-
1 differentiation protein among the endothelial cells of proliferating
vessels, In mature CL, Thy-1 released from vascular pericytes accumul
ated on the surface of GLC, and these cells exhibited LHR immunoreacti
vity (LHRI). Overall LHRI increased during the luteal phase and was st
rongest at the beginning of the late luteal phase. Although vascular p
ericytes showed strong LHRI, no staining of endothelium was detected d
uring the luteal phase. GLC exhibited strong cytokeratin staining and
moderate staining for MHC class 1 and MHC class II antigens; numerous
macrophages were detected in luteal tissue. During pregnancy, the stai
ning pattern was similar to that seen in the mature CL at the end of t
he midluteal phase. During the late luteal phase, surface expression o
f MHC class I and MHC class II antigens by GLC was substantially enhan
ced, and some T cells invaded among luteal cells. By the end of the cy
cle, an acute regression of vasculature and luteal tissue was observed
along the fibrous septa. The remaining GLC showed only surface and no
cytoplasmic LHRI. During the subsequent cycle, in the presence of num
erous T cells, regressing GLC exhibited strong surface expression of v
arious macrophage markers, such as CD4, CD14, CD68, and leukocyte comm
on antigen, a feature not detected in the CL during the luteal phase n
or described in other tissues. A complete loss of cytokeratin staining
in GLC was observed. In regressing CL, strong LHRI was present in the
endothelium of small and large luteal vessels. In conclusion, vascula
r pericytes and macrophages may stimulate the development and senescen
ce of luteal tissue. The senescence of GLC may be inconsistent with pr
eservation of luteal vasculature, and T lymphocytes appear to particip
ate in terminal regression of the CL. Regression of luteal tissue ther
efore resembles immunologic rejection of a transplant. During pregnanc
y, the aging process of GLC appears to be interrupted, possibly due to
the temporary acceptance of the CL ''graft.''