Background: Seizures are rarely witnessed by physicians, and the diagn
osis is usually made on the basis of the history. Tongue biting is cla
ssically considered to favor a diagnosis of epileptic seizure. The use
fulness of tongue biting in the differential diagnosis of seizures was
evaluated. Methods: A prospective study of the presence of oral lacer
ations in 106 consecutive patients admitted to our Epilepsy Monitoring
Unit and a retrospective study of a population of 45 patients with sy
ncope were performed. The relationship between tongue biting and diagn
osis (epileptic vs nonepileptic events) was analyzed. Results: Of the
106 monitored patients, 63 had episodes characterized by bilateral mot
or activity, complete loss of consciousness, or both; 34 patients had
epileptic seizures, while 29 patients had exclusively nonepileptic epi
sodes. Eight patients suffered an oral laceration; all involved the si
de of the tongue, and all had documented epileptic seizures. Of the 45
patients with syncope, in only one was the tongue lacerated, and this
was at the tip. Tongue biting had a sensitivity of 24% and a specific
ity of 99% for the diagnosis of generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Lat
eral tongue biting was 100% specific to grand mal seizures. Conclusion
: Tongue biting, particularly if it is lateral, is highly specific to
generalized tonic-clonic seizures.