Ce. Floyd et al., SELENIUM-BASED DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY OF THE CHEST - RADIOLOGISTS PREFERENCE COMPARED WITH FILM-SCREEN RADIOGRAPHS, American journal of roentgenology, 165(6), 1995, pp. 1353-1358
OBJECTIVE. A new digital thoracic radiography system (Thoravision; Phi
lips Medical Systems, Hamburg, Germany), which uses selenium as a dete
ctor material, was evaluated for observer preference. The system has b
een shown to have higher detection efficiency than conventional film-s
creen systems and thus could provide an image with reduced noise. The
hypothesis tested in this study was that the selenium-based digital sy
stem would provide an image appearance for conventional thoracic imagi
ng that would be equal or superior to that provided by a conventional
film-screen system. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-three patient volunte
ers were imaged at 120 kV with both the selenium-based system and a th
oracic film-screen combination system (InSight HC; Kodak, Rochester, N
Y). Posteroanterior and lateral images were acquired with both systems
, for a total of 212 images. Both imaging systems included a stationar
y 12:1 antiscatter grid. Exposures were the same for both imaging syst
ems, and the digital images were printed to film. Images for the same
patient were compared by six observers-three specialized chest radiolo
gists and three general radiologists. Images included both normal ches
t radiographs and radiographs with abnormal findings. Each pair of ima
ges was ranked on a scale from 1 to 5 for preference of technique, wit
h a score of 3 indicating no preference. Eleven anatomic features were
evaluated in the posteroanterior views, and six features were evaluat
ed in the lateral views. Statistical significance of preference was ev
aluated with Student's t test. RESULTS. The chest radiologists had a s
tatistically significant preference for the serenium-based system for
all 17 features (p < .001). The general radiologists had a statistical
ly significant preference for the selenium-based system for visualizat
ion of 10 of the 17 features (p < .05). Neither group had a statistica
lly significant preference for the conventional images in any category
.CONCLUSION. The selenium-based system provided an image appearance th
at was significantly preferred by all radiologists, more strongly by t
hose specializing in chest radiography. This study demonstrates that a
digital thoracic imaging system can routinely produce images that are
perceived as equal or superior to conventional images.