MONOCYTE DIFFERENTIATION AND ACCESSORY FUNCTION - DIFFERENT EFFECTS ON THE PROLIFERATIVE RESPONSES OF AN AUTOREACTIVE T-CELL CLONE AS COMPARED TO ALLOREACTIVE OR ANTIGEN-SPECIFIC T-CELL LINES AND PRIMARY MIXEDLYMPHOCYTE-CULTURES
M. Schlesier et al., MONOCYTE DIFFERENTIATION AND ACCESSORY FUNCTION - DIFFERENT EFFECTS ON THE PROLIFERATIVE RESPONSES OF AN AUTOREACTIVE T-CELL CLONE AS COMPARED TO ALLOREACTIVE OR ANTIGEN-SPECIFIC T-CELL LINES AND PRIMARY MIXEDLYMPHOCYTE-CULTURES, Immunobiology, 190(1-2), 1994, pp. 164-174
An autoreactive T cell clone derived from a patient with reactive arth
ritis, two alloreactive T cell lines, two antigen-specific T cell line
s and allogeneic resting T cells were analyzed for their responses to
monocytes and macrophages derived from monocytes by in vitro different
iation.?he autoreactive T cell clone strongly proliferated in response
to fresh monocytes and to macrophages derived from a 7 day culture, b
ut only poorly to monocytes cultured for 2 days. In contrast, alloreac
tive and antigen-specific T cell lines proliferated to all stimulator
cells equally well. Finally, primary mixed lymphocyte reactions could
be stimulated by both fresh and 2-day cultured monocytes, but not by i
n vitro derived macrophages. The impaired response of the autoreactive
T cell clone to 2-day cultured monocytes could not be attributed to r
educed expression of several well-defined surface molecules nor to ind
uction of nonresponsiveness. Neither allogeneic monocytes nor cytokine
s (IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6) could correct the defective response of the
autoreactive T cell clone. However, preculture of monocytes in the pr
esence of interferon-gamma, IL-1, IL-4 or IL-6 retained their stimulat
ory capacity. Our interpretation of the selectively impaired response
of the autoreactive T cell clone is that it most likely recognizes a d
ifferentiation-dependent monocyte/macrophage-specific peptide.