COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF 3 PMS ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS - THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREMENSTRUAL-SYNDROME WITH CORE SYMPTOMS

Citation
S. Thysjacobs et al., COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF 3 PMS ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS - THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREMENSTRUAL-SYNDROME WITH CORE SYMPTOMS, Psychopharmacology bulletin, 31(2), 1995, pp. 389-396
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,Neurosciences,"Pharmacology & Pharmacy",Psychiatry,Neurosciences,"Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Journal title
ISSN journal
00485764
Volume
31
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
389 - 396
Database
ISI
SICI code
0048-5764(1995)31:2<389:CO3PAI>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a commonly encountered complaint among women, This study compared the PMS Diary (PMSD), which measures core m enstrual symptoms (negative affect, water retention, and pain symptoms ), with two commonly used self-rating forms, the Menstrual Distress Qu estionnaire (MDQ) and the Daily Rating Form (DRF), Thirty-seven premen opausal women with documented PMS completed the forms. A multitrait-mu ltimethod analysis was performed to determine overall agreement and re liability. The three instruments and their component scale scores had strong internal consistency, Correlations between overall scores and b etween scales measuring similar constructs were strong, Correlations w ere 0.77 between PMSD and MDQ; 0.67 between PMSD and DRF; and 0.81 bet ween MDQ and DRF. The PMSD performs as effectively as more extensive q uestionnaires in measuring symptoms in women with PMS, The PMS Diary i s a concise yet reliable and valid instrument that can be easily admin istered in ambulatory care and longitudinal research.