The possible economic value of the quantification of uncertainty in fu
ture ensemble-based surface weather forecasts is investigated using a
formal, idealized decision model. Current, or baseline, weather foreca
sts are represented by probabilistic forecasts of moderate accuracy, a
s measured by the ranked probability score. Hypothetical ensemble-base
d forecasts are constructed by supplementing the baseline set of proba
bilistic forecasts with lower- and higher-skill forecasts. These are c
hosen in such a way that mixtures of the forecasts including the lower
- and higher-skill subsets with equal frequency exhibit the same accur
acy overall as the moderately accurate (conventional, baseline) foreca
sts. For both simple one-time decisions (static situation) and related
sequences of decisions (dynamic situation), these hypothetical ensemb
le-based forecasts are found to lead to greater economic value in the
idealized decision problem when protective actions are relatively inex
pensive, corresponding to real-world problems. However, for some decis
ion problems considered, the ensemble-based forecasts are slightly les
s valuable than the baseline forecasts. This result derives at least i
n part from the (probably unrealistic) assumption that the ensemble-ba
sed forecasts are no more skillful in aggregate than their conventiona
l counterparts, but implies that positive economic value for ensemble
forecasts with respect to this baseline will not be automatic. Rather,
for ensemble-based forecasts to be at least as valuable for all decis
ion problems, they will need to exhibit sufficiently higher skill in a
ggregate than the conventional forecasts that could have been produced
in their place.