EFFICIENCY OF LOWER THRESHOLD CRITERIA FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF GESTATIONAL DIABETES

Citation
Md. Berkus et al., EFFICIENCY OF LOWER THRESHOLD CRITERIA FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF GESTATIONAL DIABETES, Obstetrics and gynecology, 86(6), 1995, pp. 892-896
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00297844
Volume
86
Issue
6
Year of publication
1995
Pages
892 - 896
Database
ISI
SICI code
0029-7844(1995)86:6<892:EOLTCF>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the incidence of adverse outcome in normal un treated gravidas with minimal hyperglycemia, classified as having gest ational diabetes mellitus (GDM) by threshold criteria lower than curre nt standards; to determine how efficient the different criteria are in identifying infants at risk for morbidity; and to explore the pathoph ysiology of minimal hyperglycemia using the glucose tolerance test (GT T) periodicity concept. Methods: Seven hundred eight subjects consider ed nondiabetic by current ACOG criteria were reclassified by the crite ria of Coustan (fasting 95, 1 hour 180, 2 hours 155, and 5 hours 140 m g/dL), Sacks (96, 172, 152, and 131 mg/dL), or Langer (at least one ab normal ACOG value). Glucose tolerance test periodicity, the incidence of large for gestational age (LGA) neonates, and macrosomia were then determined for each gravida diagnosed as having GDM by these criteria. Results: Both Coustan and Langer criteria identified a significantly greater incidence of LGA infants compared with non-GDM (23.6 and 25.3% , respectively, versus 14%, P < .05), and identified them as efficient ly as current criteria, approximately one LGA infant for every four GD M subjects treated. The incidence of LGA did not differ between the Sa cks GDM and non-GDM groups. Glucose tolerance test periodicity for new ly diagnosed GDM gravidas was significantly longer than non-GDM for Co ustan and Langer criteria (3.9 and 4.06 versus 3.3 hours, P < .01) but not for the Sacks criteria. Conclusion: Using lower threshold criteri a to diagnose GDM identified morbidity at an incidence and efficiency comparable to current standards. These newly diagnosed GDM gravidas ha d abnormal GTT characteristics, with each group exceeding the 3.5-hour GTT periodicity limit previously found for nondiabetic gravidas. Sack s's conversion of existing standards may be too low to efficiently ide ntify pregnant subjects at risk for increased morbidity.