PURPOSE: To provide a description of the MR and enhanced MR appearance
s of subependymomas. METHODS: We reviewed the MR examinations of eight
cases of pathologically proved subependymomas and correlated them wit
h operative and pathologic reports, and also reviewed the previous pub
lished cases of subependymomas documented by MR. Gadopentetate dimeglu
mine-enhanced MR examination was performed in seven cases. RESULTS: On
e patient presented with four subependymomas, two patients had subepen
dymomas of the cervical spine, and the others were intraventricular wi
th no transependymal extension. They were isointense to hypointense re
lative to normal white matter on T1-weighted images, heterogeneous in
five cases. Minimal (n = 1) or no (n = 3) enhancement was noted in fou
r cases, and moderate or marked enhancement was noted in three cases.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that even though there is no specific sign of
subependymomas, when confronted with a complete intraventricular lesio
n or with a spinal lesion causing little or no edema which is minimall
y enhancing or nonenhancing, one must consider the diagnosis of subepe
ndymoma.