Analyses of the welfare system generally examine one of five competing
models: (1) The work disincentive model; (2) the human capital model;
(3) the macroeconomic model; (4) the public choice model; or (5) the
cost-of-job-loss model. This paper employs the Granger causality conce
pt and the multiple-rank F statistic to test the implications of all f
ive of these models simultaneously. The results offer modest support t
o all but the macroeconomic model. The relationships among welfare ben
efits, caseloads, and labor market conditions appear to be too complex
to be fully captured by a single model.