STRATEGY USE IN JENSENS RT PARADIGM - RELATIONSHIPS TO INTELLIGENCE

Citation
C. Stough et al., STRATEGY USE IN JENSENS RT PARADIGM - RELATIONSHIPS TO INTELLIGENCE, Australian journal of psychology, 47(2), 1995, pp. 61-65
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology
ISSN journal
00049530
Volume
47
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
61 - 65
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-9530(1995)47:2<61:SUIJRP>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Jensen has reported several studies that have demonstrated a significa nt relationship between measures of choice reaction time (RT) and IQ, and has concluded that speed of information processing is causally rel ated to the development of intelligence. All of these studies have emp loyed a procedure that separates decision time (DT) from movement time (MT), and which assumes that the time from stimulus onset to the rele ase of a home key accurately measures DT. Recently, Smith and Carew (1 987) provided evidence that some subjects use task strategies which sh orten and thus bias their DTs. Such a strategy may invalidate speed of information processing explanations of past DT-IQ results. The presen t study replicates the Smith and Carew finding, and provides prelimina ry information on the relationship between both masked and unmasked RT measures and intelligence test scores. The results indicate that the addition of a mask (to prevent strategy use in RT tasks) adds a consta nt amount of time to the average 1-, 2-, 4-, and 8-choice DTs, and doe s not change the slope of the function relation mean DT across stimulu s complexity. As significant negative correlations between mean DT and IQ (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised and the Raven Advance d Progressive Matrices) were observed in both masked and unmasked RT c onditions, it is suggested that: strategy use in this procedure does n ot cause the relationship between DT and IQ reported in previous exper iments. MT variables and IQ were negatively correlated. Slope of mean DT across choice and IQ were not significantly correlated. These resul ts suggest that the Hick information processing model of intelligence should be replaced.