PREPARATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF MONOP ARTICULATE LAYERS COMPOSED OF PARTIALLY HYDROPHOBIC GLASS AND SILICA PARTICLES - A LANGMUIR FILM BALANCE STUDY .1.
Z. Horvolgyi et al., PREPARATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF MONOP ARTICULATE LAYERS COMPOSED OF PARTIALLY HYDROPHOBIC GLASS AND SILICA PARTICLES - A LANGMUIR FILM BALANCE STUDY .1., Magyar kemiai folyoirat, 101(11), 1995, pp. 488-497
Monoparticulate layers of partially hydrophobic (silanized) glass and
silica beads (2R = 75 +/- 5 and 3 +/- 1 mu m, respectively) were studi
ed in Langmuir film balance. Surface pressure vs. surface area isother
ms were determined which permitted some conclusions concerning particl
e-particle (p-p) and particle-subphase (p-s) interactions. 1, Methods
were suggested a, for the determination of the p-p distance in the sec
ondary potential energy minimum as well as the p-p repulsive interacti
on energy as a function of interparticle distance for weakly cohesive
monoparticulate layers and b, for the approximation of p-p adhesion en
ergy for (strongly) cohesive monoparticulate layers. Interparticle dis
tances between particles of weakly cohesive monoparticulate layers in
their secondary interaction energy minimum have been assessed to be 49
0 nm by method a,. This distance is in fair agreement with that calcul
ated by the DLVO theory, augmented by capillary interaction. However,
the calculated total (repulsive) interaction energies (E(rep) = (0,5 -
1,3)10(-13) J) between these particles are some two orders of magnitu
de greater than expected (10(-16) - 10(-15) J). This discrepancy is no
t completely understood at present. The particle-particle adhesion ene
rgies for the strongly cohesive layers of the most hydrophobic particl
es (Theta = 90 degrees, 2R = 75 mu m and 3 mu m) were approximated by
method b,. They were in good agreement with each other (85 - 100 mJm(-
2) for the larger and 111-133 mJm(-2) for the smaller particles, respe
ctively) and with the ''pull-off'' energy obtained earlier for silaniz
ed glass surfaces (41). 2, The p-s interaction was examined by compari
ng the energy which is necessary for particle removal from the monopar
ticulate layer, E(r), determined via II vs. A isotherms, with the adhe
sion work, W-r, determined by in situ contact angle measurements. Sati
sfactory agreement between E(r) and W-r was obtained for the monoparti
culate layers which were prepared from the more hydrophobic particles
(Theta = 90 degrees, 2R = 75 mu m and 2R = 3 mu m). Significant discre
pancies between E(r) and W-r for the monoparticulate layers which were
prepared from the less hydrophobic (Theta = 72 degrees and Theta = 55
degrees) particles were interpreted in terms of contact angle hystere
sis, dynamic wetting, and distortion of the electric double layer arou
nd the interfacial particles.