PURPOSE: To document the proctographic features of anismus at evacuati
on proctography and determine the optimum radiologic measurements for
diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with anismus ac
cording to clinical and multiple physiologic criteria were examined wi
th evacuation proctography. Structural and functional measurements wer
e compared with those of a group of 20 asymptomatic subjects. RESULTS:
No significant difference between patients and control subjects was f
ound with respect to pelvic descent, rectocele, or any anorectal angle
measurement In patients with anismus, initiation of evacuation was pr
olonged (median, 9 vs 3 seconds for control subjects; P < .0001) and a
nal canal width was reduced (median, 0.6 vs 1.2 cm; P = .0075). Evacua
tion time was increased (median, 50 vs 10 seconds; P < .0001), and the
percentage of contrast material evacuated was decreased (median, 60%
vs 100%; P < .0001). Only four patients were able to evacuate more tha
n 66% of the contrast material within 30 seconds, whereas all control
subjects were able to do so. CONCLUSION: Measurement of the anorectal
angle to diagnose anismus should be abandoned. Patients with anismus d
emonstrate delayed initiation of evacuation, which is also prolonged a
nd incomplete. Incomplete evacuation after 30 seconds is highly sugges
tive of anismus.