Dv. Beard et al., INTERPRETATION TIME OF SERIAL CHEST CT EXAMINATIONS WITH STACKED-METAPHOR WORKSTATION VERSUS FILM ALTERNATOR, Radiology, 197(3), 1995, pp. 753-758
PURPOSE: Interpretation time of serial staging chest CT cases, which e
ach contained current and previous examinations, with a simple prototy
pe workstation called filmstack was experimentally compared with inter
pretation time with a film alternator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The film
stack displayed a ''stack'' of,sections for each examination; user con
trols allowed rapid selection of preset attenuation windows and both s
ynchronized and unsynchronized scrolling. Eight radiologists were time
d as they used the filmstack and the film alternator to interpret four
ergonomically complex serial CT cases. RESULTS: All reports dictated
on the basis of findings with filmstack and film were of acceptable cl
inical accuracy. The time to examine a case with filmstack was signifi
cantly faster than the time with film, including the time to load and
unload the alternator (99% confidence [P = .01]). There was no statist
ically significant difference in interpretation time between filmstack
and prehung film. CONCLUSION: Use of a low-cost stacked CT workstatio
n with a single 1,024 x 1,024 monitor is an effective means of interpr
eting cases that require comparison of multiple CT examinations.