The methodologies of Husserlian and contemporary phenomenological psyc
hology are compared. The Husserlian project was an a priori, descripti
ve, intuitive inquiry into the universal, necessary structures of inte
ntional phenomena. Contemporary phenomenological psychology, examined
here through a review of contemporary psychological articles and metho
dological sources, includes four types of methods: empirical, hermeneu
tic, traditional and experimental. Phenomenological psychology continu
es to attempt to describe the essences of experiences. However, in con
trast to the Husserlian phase, the current stage of the movement is ch
aracterized by the inclusion of the experience of a group of subjects
in addition to that of the researcher, the use of hermeneutic rather t
han descriptive methods, existentialism as an interpretive guide, and
the use of empirical as well as a priori evidence for the generalizabi
lity of descriptions. Essentialism as a central tenet of phenomenologi
cal psychology is criticized in light of anthropological evidence.