Haemaccel is often used for the resuscitation of shocked patients. It
is common practice to introduce an air inlet into the plastic containe
r to increase the flow rate. We investigated how much difference an ai
r inlet made. We compared the flow rates with no air inlet, a single a
ir inlet, a 2 x 2 cm hole (equivalent to multiple air inlets) and a pr
essure infusion cuff. Although the use of an air inlet compared with n
o air inlet reduced the time to infuse 500 ml by 27 s, the difference
was only clinically significant over the final 100 ml. A pressure cuff
produced the fastest flow, reducing the time by 68 s. Use of an air i
nlet, however, precludes subsequent use of a pressure cuff. We recomme
nd that the practice of using air inlets for Haemaccel and other simil
arly packaged products is abandoned.