COMPUTER PRODUCTION K-INDEXES - REVIEW AND COMPARISON OF METHODS

Citation
M. Menvielle et al., COMPUTER PRODUCTION K-INDEXES - REVIEW AND COMPARISON OF METHODS, Geophysical journal international, 123(3), 1995, pp. 866-886
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Geosciences, Interdisciplinary
ISSN journal
0956540X
Volume
123
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
866 - 886
Database
ISI
SICI code
0956-540X(1995)123:3<866:CPK-RA>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
The K indices are to be hand-scaled from analogue magnetograms followi ng morphological criteria expressed in the so-called Mayaud rules. All observatories used to follow these rules in the routine hand-scaling of K indices from analogue magnetograms. As a result of digitalization and automation of observatories, however, observers in charge who are experienced in K scaling from analogue magnetograms are becoming incr easingly rare. Therefore the organizations running observatories were forced to find compensating machine methods for the production of K in dices. The basic features of the K indices and the Mayaud rules are fi rst reviewed, and then the methods developed for computer derivation o f K indices are discussed. In order to decide which of the proposed al gorithms was suitable, a comparison among them was organized by the IA GA Working Group on geomagnetic indices. The comparison was made with a common data set, using the same statistical tests, The results are s ummarized and discussed. Further comparisons between the K indices pro duced by computer with the different methods are presented in this pap er. Four methods were acknowledged by the Working Group during the Vie nna IUGG general Assembly in 1991. The results confirm that these meth ods provide acceptable results in comparison to the average quality of hand-scaled indices.A comparison between computer-produced K indices and reference K indices hand-scaled following the Bartels-Mayaud rules is also presented, It appears that only two acknowledged methods prov ide computer-produced K in good agreement with hand-scaled K. The best computer method (the FMI method) is found to be good enough to allow the continuation of the long tradition of producing K indices without any serious jump in the statistics.