The K indices are to be hand-scaled from analogue magnetograms followi
ng morphological criteria expressed in the so-called Mayaud rules. All
observatories used to follow these rules in the routine hand-scaling
of K indices from analogue magnetograms. As a result of digitalization
and automation of observatories, however, observers in charge who are
experienced in K scaling from analogue magnetograms are becoming incr
easingly rare. Therefore the organizations running observatories were
forced to find compensating machine methods for the production of K in
dices. The basic features of the K indices and the Mayaud rules are fi
rst reviewed, and then the methods developed for computer derivation o
f K indices are discussed. In order to decide which of the proposed al
gorithms was suitable, a comparison among them was organized by the IA
GA Working Group on geomagnetic indices. The comparison was made with
a common data set, using the same statistical tests, The results are s
ummarized and discussed. Further comparisons between the K indices pro
duced by computer with the different methods are presented in this pap
er. Four methods were acknowledged by the Working Group during the Vie
nna IUGG general Assembly in 1991. The results confirm that these meth
ods provide acceptable results in comparison to the average quality of
hand-scaled indices.A comparison between computer-produced K indices
and reference K indices hand-scaled following the Bartels-Mayaud rules
is also presented, It appears that only two acknowledged methods prov
ide computer-produced K in good agreement with hand-scaled K. The best
computer method (the FMI method) is found to be good enough to allow
the continuation of the long tradition of producing K indices without
any serious jump in the statistics.