The paper investigates trade strategy classification within a general
equilibrium framework which includes both tradeables and non-tradeable
s. In a three-sector model there is apparently a wider range of trade
strategies available than in the traditional two-sector model. Besides
pure import-substitution (IS) and export promotion (EP) policies, min
ed IS/EP policies might seek (ex ante) to create a pro-tradeables bias
rather than approximate neutrality. However, the ex-post outcome depe
nds upon the substitution complementarity and/or income effects of com
mercial policies on equilibrium relative prices. The paper demonstrate
s that the actual change in the incentive structure may differ from th
e intended strategy.